Outcomes of Trump's Second Strait of Hormuz ultimatum
321
2.5kṀ51k
Apr 11
62%
Iran complies with the ultimatum's demands
49%
Trump walks back his ultimatum
48%
Israel-Hezbollah ceasefire is included in the US-Iran ceasefire
40%
Iran cancels ceasefire due to further Israeli attacks.
32%
Major escalation in military strikes by Israel/US
27%
Conditional on Market 1, Iran says there have been no significant concessions made by them. (resolves N/A if Market 1 is NO)
24%
Lifting of all sanctions on Iran
22%
Major escalation by Iran
16%
Trump mentions Mukesh or an anagram thereof
14%
TACO (no deal, no escalation, Trump declares victory and unilaterally withdawals akin to a chess pigeon)
12%
The ultimatum expires with no significant change
10%
Trump announces a deal that turns out to be fake.
5%
ground operation starts
3%
Nuclear weapons will be used
Resolvido
YES
Ultimatum is extended
Resolvido
YES
Trump announces a deal that turns out to be real.
Resolvido
YES
Trump announces a deal.
Resolvido
YES
Ultimatum is extended past April 11
Resolvido
YES
Trump claims significant concessions have been won in justification of a deadline extension (Market 1)

Trump renewed his ultimatum. What will be the outcome of this one?

  • Update 2026-04-05 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Major escalation by X will resolve Yes even if the escalation was done in retaliation to the other side escalating first (i.e., it is not limited to initiation of hostilities).

  • Update 2026-04-05 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The 'Ultimatum is extended' answer will be resolved based on how things look after 4/6 10:05 AM.

  • Update 2026-04-06 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The 'ultimatum expires with no significant change' answer refers to the ultimatum after all extensions have been exhausted, not just the original ultimatum.

  • Update 2026-04-07 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator is waiting to see how the situation fully develops before resolving major escalation answers, to avoid premature resolution.

  • Update 2026-04-07: The "announces a deal" market requires that the announcement say that a deal has been reached, not that they have a framework or rough draft of a deal.

  • Update 2026-04-07: "Trump announces a deal" and "Market 1" are resolving to yes in reference to the two-week ceasefire for Hormuz part of this tweet:

    • Update 2026-04-07: "Trump announces a deal that turns out to be real." is resolving to yes in reference to the two-week ceasefire and this confirmation from Iran:

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!
Ordenar por:
vendeu Ṁ71 NO

why the probability for "Trump walks back the ultimatum" is so high? it's not like he gave up on it, no?

comprou Ṁ50 YES

@JoshSnider resolves YES, a ceasefire deal was announced, meeting the criteria of the tweeted ultimatum

comprou Ṁ30 NO

I think it's also safe to solve this option to NO: Trump announces a deal that turns out to be fake.

@someoneR5c8l he could still announce another deal that turns out to be fake, doesn't have to be the same deal.

@Balasar that's too creative of an interpretation imo. The probabilities of "turns out to be real" and "turns out to be fake" are better summed up to 100%

@Balasar I agree with this interpretation tbh

proof that the deal is real??

comprou Ṁ0 YES
comprou Ṁ10 NO

@JoshSnider thanks!

"We have closed all communication channels with Washington"

If this actually happens and it's anything like the 10 point plan that they put out a week ago then it would be a total rout for Iran.

God fucking damn it.

How???

This is crazy.

I resolved two of the props. Are there any others that could be resolved now?

@JoshSnider surely "announces a deal" should be resolved. it has been "announced".

@Balasar "Almost all of the various points of past contention have been agreed to between the United States and Iran, but a two week period will allow the Agreement to be finalized and consummated."

This is pretty optimistic, but it's still announcing a basis to negotiate a deal, not a deal actually being reached.

@JoshSnider the deal that was announced was an agreement to a two-week ceasefire, not a peace deal. The criteria does not specify what deal has to be reached, or even if it is a real deal.

@JoshSnider market 1? he claims concessions have been made by iran through pakistan and that justifies him extending the deadline by 2 weeks

@minion7777777777 Okay, I'm resolving market 1 and the announce a deal on the grounds that Trump announced a 2-week ceasefire deal in exchange for Iran reopening Hormuz.

comprou Ṁ30 YES
comprou Ṁ10 YES
vendeu Ṁ60 YES

@LietKynes Iran hasn't confirmed it but it should be good enough for resolution

could it be?

@Balasar he can't keep TACOing. every time he does, next time he has to make an even bigger threat to then TACO out of

comprou Ṁ10 YES

@Balasar NYTimes: Iran’s ambassador to Pakistan said in a social media post on Tuesday evening that diplomacy to stop the war had taken a “step forward” from a “critical, sensitive stage.” The statement came after the prime minister of Pakistan, which has been acting as an intermediary in the search for a peace deal, appealed to President Trump to extend his deadline by two weeks.

comprou Ṁ10 YES

@Balasar

Trump rn considering this proposal:

© Predita Markets, Inc.Termos de UsoPrivacidade