Will it be conclusively shown (through some way) that slowing the aging rate of AI researchers down (eg interventions decreasing DNAm age) will increase their net output/productivity by 2029?

1kṀ938

2030

14%

chance

ALL

by any statistically significant amount even if small

Productivity

Get

1,000

to start trading!

Pessoas também estão operando

Will AI double the human lifespan within 10 years? (Before february 2035)

24% chance

By which year will AI significantly extend the human lifespan (by at least 20 years)?

Will AI double the human lifespan within 5 years? (Before february 2030)

4% chance

Will AI surpass humans in conducting scientific research by 2030?

31% chance

Will scientists confirm the reversal of ageing in humans through genetic editing or other technologies by the end 2045?

44% chance

By 2050, will there be a cure to aging conditional on no AGI by 2050?

15% chance

Will a therapy that substantially slows down or reverses the aging process in humans be developed before 2040?

60% chance

Will a human-proven cure for aging that increases life expectancy by at least 20 years exist by 2036?

20% chance

By 2050, will there be a cure to aging conditional on AGI by 2050?

48% chance

Will models be able to do the work of an AI researcher/engineer before 2027?

Ordenar por:

How does this market resolve if it's shown that slowing the aging rate of researchers in general increases their productivity?

Why is this specifically about AI researchers rather than any other profession?

Freezing AI researchers halts their aging rate but does not increase their net productivity. Therefore, halting aging does not necessarily improve productivity.

if you mean specifically measures of AI research output, which does not seem particularly measurable, this just seems like a 'will a bad study appearing to show X be published'. stastical signifiance isn't that hard if your study is bad, and there's way more ways to mess up a study than to not