
This market closes when Artemis 2 returns to Earth (resolves YES), a member of its crew dies during the mission (resolves NO), or the mission is scrapped before T–0 (resolves N/A), whichever occurs first.
Related markets:
/jks/will-artemis-2-return-to-earth-with (this question)
/jks/will-artemis-3-return-to-earth-with
/jks/will-artemis-4-return-to-earth-with
/jks/will-artemis-5-return-to-earth-with
/jks/will-artemis-6-return-to-earth-with
Update 2025-08-29 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): - If Artemis 2 launches with no humans on board (uncrewed), this market will resolve N/A.
Pessoas também estão operando
I really think this market is overvalued. Here's two links to get started:
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1ddi792xdfNXcBwF8qpDUxmZzIksrs0jy/
https://idlewords.com/2026/03/artemis_ii_is_not_safe_to_fly.htm
@SimonWestlake I thought for sure there was no way a mission would launch with 1/20 chance of everyone being dead, but then after reading more and more about it, it turns out that everyone just accepts this and 1/20 may be a realistic real value rather than something more like 1/200 which I would have guessed.
@Eliza I think it's less that everyone accepts it, but that NASA systematically denies it by using insufficient analysis that gets them numbers that they like
@Eliza FWIW, I doubt they will presently fly it with the current heat shield, my bet is they will delay and switch.
@Eliza Seems like the usual lack of incentives to bet down tiny probabilities. Maybe a market zooming in on the low end could help?
@Eliza look up Casey Handmer's blogs about Artemis, he argues that this is a terribly unsafe program and NASA is ignoring problems just like they did with the space shuttle
How much can I trust the 96 here? There is absolutely no freaking way the organization would accept that risk level if it was true, right????
@EvanDaniel find a way to get the real probability!!!
Updating closing date to 30 September 2025 due to delays:
