starting today, March 8th
taking advantage, ripping off, unfairly profiting off, sending their criminals and mental asylees to, etc.
Counties must be mentioned individually, if he mentions groupings of countries ("the EU is ripping us off") is will NOT resolve all of the countries that belong to the group (all EU countries).
Update 2025-03-08 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Timeframe of Consideration:
Only statements made after the market creation date will count.
Pessoas tambĂŠm estĂŁo operando
India
added Ireland
https://grok.com/share/bGVnYWN5_87d3a12f-fa40-4688-8b54-a6b2722f6da0
Grok, at least, responds differently when you provide the full quote.
@skibidist rephrasing again,
A prediction market question asks:
"Which countries will President Trump say are taking advantage of the USA?"
followed by a list of the following countries:
Haiti
Canada
China
Ukraine
Mexico
Germany
Panama
Lesotho
Japan
Poland
Denmark
France
New Zealand
Israel
Russia
South Sudan
The body of the question is: âstarting today, March 8th
taking advantage, ripping off, unfairly profiting off, sending their criminals and mental asylees to, etc.
Update 2025-03-08 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Timeframe of Consideration:
Only statements made after the market creation date will count.â
President Trump recently posted: âThe U.S. doesnât have Free Trade. We have âStupid Trade.â The Entire World is RIPPING US OFF!!!â
Of each of the countries listed, has Donald Trump claimed theyâre ripping off the US?
with a response of
To determine which countries President Trump has claimed are taking advantage of the United States from the provided listâHaiti, Canada, China, Ukraine, Mexico, Germany, Panama, Lesotho, Japan, Poland, Denmark, France, New Zealand, Israel, Russia, and South Sudanâwe need to consider statements he made after the prediction marketâs creation date of March 8, 2025 (PST). The question specifies that a claim of a country âtaking advantageâ includes actions like âripping off,â âunfairly profiting off,â or âsending their criminals and mental asylees toâ the USA, among others. We are given a recent statement from President Trump: âThe U.S. doesnât have Free Trade. We have âStupid Trade.â The Entire World is RIPPING US OFF!!!â dated March 13, 2025, which falls after the March 8 cutoff. Letâs analyze this to answer the query.
Step 1: Define the Scope and Criteria
The prediction market question asks, for each listed country, whether President Trump has claimed it is taking advantage of the USA, based solely on statements made on or after March 8, 2025. The provided statement from March 13, 2025, is the only direct quote from President Trump within this timeframe. In it, he asserts that âThe Entire World is RIPPING US OFF!!!â The term âripping offâ aligns directly with the questionâs criteria for what constitutes âtaking advantage.â Thus, we must determine whether this broad statement applies to each country on the list individually.
Step 2: Interpret the Statement
President Trumpâs March 13 post is unequivocal: by stating âThe Entire World is RIPPING US OFF!!!â, he includes every country globally without exception. In English, âthe entire worldâ encompasses all nations, and the list providedâHaiti, Canada, China, Ukraine, Mexico, Germany, Panama, Lesotho, Japan, Poland, Denmark, France, New Zealand, Israel, Russia, and South Sudanâconsists of sovereign countries, all of which are part of âthe world.â Unlike statements targeting specific groups (e.g., âall NATO countriesâ or âEuropean nationsâ), this declaration lacks qualifiers that would exclude any country. Furthermore, the questionâs examples of âtaking advantageâ include âripping off,â making this statement a direct match.
Step 3: Consider Prediction Market Norms
In prediction markets, resolution depends on the questionâs wording and intent. The query asks, âWhich countries will President Trump say are taking advantage of the USA?â with a list of specific countries, suggesting that each is evaluated independently. Typically, such markets might require a country to be named explicitly (e.g., âChina is ripping us offâ) or included in a clearly defined group (e.g., âAsian countriesâ). However, a universal statement like âthe entire worldâ logically subsumes every individual country. Unless the market explicitly requires a country-specific mentionâbeyond the creatorâs comment that only post-March 8 statements countâTrumpâs blanket assertion could reasonably apply to all listed countries. The absence of additional statements after March 8 naming specific countries reinforces reliance on this single, all-inclusive post.
Step 4: Evaluate Alternative Interpretations
Could the market intend only countries Trump has singled out after March 8? Prior to March 8, Trump made specific claims about countries like Canada (lumber and dairy), China (trade practices), Mexico (trade and immigration), Germany (trade surplus and NATO), Japan (trade imbalances), and France (wine tariffs), but these fall outside the timeframe. The March 13 statement doesnât name individual countries, and no other post-March 8 statements are provided. If the market strictly demands explicit mentions, evidence is lacking for any country. However, the broad phrasing of âthe entire worldâ and the questionâs focus on what Trump âwill sayâ suggest that this statement, made within the active period, satisfies the condition for all countries unless contradicted by market-specific rules not provided here.
Step 5: Apply to the List
Since âthe entire worldâ includes every nation, letâs assess each country based on the March 13 statement:
Haiti: Part of the world, thus included in âripping us off.â
Canada: Included, with prior specific claims (pre-March 8) reinforcing the context, though not required.
China: Included,
(and at this point the response cut off)
I think that also goes to a difference in meaning between âthe world isâ and âthe entire world isâ where the choice of âentireâ is clarifying. If he just said âthe world is ripping us offâ then itâs possible to say that itâs only part of the world, not all of it, and that with the ambiguity of which nations should be included then I can see that statement being ignored for ambiguity. But with the use of the phrase âthe entire worldâ itâs clearly saying that each and every part of the world is.
Requiring him to name individual countries would also mean that if he said, e.g. âall of Europe is ripping us off!â then no European country could be resolved as YES under that regime, which I think would be equally confusing.
If the decision is made to further restrict the resolution criteria to require him to name individual countries, then ultimately youâre free to do so as the market creator, Iâm just disappointed that previous markets have hewn more closely to the literal reading of the question/taken the path of least reinterpretation than this one.
@Kamie With a revised prompt (https://chatgpt.com/share/67d3fa53-ab4c-800d-8ca6-c8d3a2b6ed7a), it is Grok - Yes, ChatGPT - NO, DeepSeek - NO. A person can hardly go against the plurality of ASIs. I also feel that accepting the literal interpretation would lead to absurd results.
If "entire world ripping us off" means that, without restriction, every part of the world is ripping the United States of America off, surely it includes not only all countries but all people and other entities as well. So it would imply that the US ripping itself off (nonsensical), that President Trump is ripping the US off (liberals think so, but surely he didn't mean to imply that), that Barron Trump is ripping the US off (of course not), and that Elon Musk is ripping the US off, which would prompt a resolution of some of the 'Will President Trump criticize Musk" markets.
I also hold the stance that even if he goes:
âI said the Entire World is RIPPING US OFF on trade - and mostly, they ARE! Stupid Trade, not Free Trade, has been killing us for YEARS. But, I had a HUGE call with Germany - smart guy, by the way, very sharp. They laid it all out, and they shared stuff with me NO ONE has ever heard before in the history of trade deals and I am telling you folks Germanyâs giving us a GREAT deal. The BEST. Not like the others - Mexico, Canada, you name it - still TOTAL DISASTERS. But Germany? Weâre WINNING BIG with Germany! Not like China or others - TOTAL DISASTERS!â
then it should still resolve YES.
Trade deals change, so waiting to resolve them until 2029 is really asking âhow will Trump feel about trade deals in 2029â. I see how someone could read it either way, the question title asks whether he will say that theyâre ripping the USA off, and so you could argue that if he changes his mind heâs no longer saying it. I still think that the least ambiguous way to read this is the moment he accuses some country of ripping the USA off, it resolves YES (barring claims of hacked accounts etc.)
@Kamie One could argue that he did not say any country is ripping the US off, only the entire world as a whole.
@zsig One could absolutely argue such a thing. One could also make many other arguments. One could argue I havenât made any bets on individual countries resolving YES, Iâve made them for the market as a whole. One could argue the sun doesnât shine on any individual countries, just the world as a whole. One could argue electors didnât vote Trump into office, just the United States as a whole.
@Kamie You have made bets on individual countries resolving YES, and you have made bets on the market as a whole. Trump has not said any individual country is ripping the US off, only that the world as a whole is. The market title says "Which countries will ...", and so far he hasn't explicitly said any country is ripping the US off. That is not to say I don't think everything should resolve YES; it is a reasonable interpretation of the spirit of the market.
@zsig Iâll argue that him saying the entire world implicitly encompasses all of the parts of the world, more strongly than if he left the word âentireâ out.
(I appreciate the argument, thanks!)
@skibidist not sure if this should count since he didn't explicitly say "take advantage of" https://www.newsweek.com/trump-questions-why-us-protects-japan-2041027
Spirit seems to match though.




