If AI has an okay outcome because of a pause, will the exit strategy involve a new AI paradigm?
2
100Ṁ972038
66%
chance
1H
6H
1D
1W
1M
ALL
This resolves N/A if ASI does not have an OK outcome or if a pause is not part of the reason, and otherwise YES if a new AI paradigm is part of the reason for ASI having an OK outcome, and NO if it is not.
Definition of OK outcome:
An outcome is "okay" if it gets at least 20% of the maximum attainable cosmopolitan value that could've been attained by a positive Singularity (a la full Coherent Extrapolated Volition done correctly), and existing humans don't suffer death or any other awful fates.
A new AI paradigm is any AI paradigm that is not deep learning. This can include one that is already known to science - there would still be novelty in making it ASI-capable, when currently it only appears that deep learning can do that first.
Esta pergunta é gerenciada e resolvida pela Predita.
Get
1,000 to start trading!
Pessoas também estão operando
Perguntas relacionadas
If Artificial General Intelligence has an okay outcome, what will be the reason?
If a huge alignment effort is part of the reason for AI having an okay outcome, will it involve a new AI paradigm?
60% chance
Will we get ASI before 2028?
2% chance
Will we get ASI before 2036?
45% chance
If AGI has an okay outcome, will it be via the MIRI path of a pause ended with the help of some other technology?
39% chance
If AI has an okay outcome because of a new paradigm, where did AI progress stall out?
Will ASI be developed 5+ years after AGI?
38% chance
Conditional on humanity surviving to 2035, will a global AI pause have been enacted?
19% chance
If AI has an okay outcome because of a huge alignment effort, where did AI progress stall out?
In 2030, will we think FLI's 6 month pause open letter helped or harmed our AI x-risk chances?