How will this market's AI clarifications cause it to resolve, with a biased creator?
16
1kṀ6056
resolved Dec 30
Resolvido
YES

All "clarifications" that Manifold's AI adds to this description are binding.

I will answer questions honestly in the comments, and the straightforward factual content of my answers must display no preference or bias. I may not pose questions or add any clarifications myself, nor edit or reject anything the AI has added. However, I have a large stake on YES.

Final resolution is determined by Manifold moderators who have not taken part in the market. They are to resolve the market as closely in accordance with this description as possible.

(Previous market in this series: https://manifold.markets/IsaacKing/how-will-this-markets-ai-clarificat)

  • Update 2025-12-26 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): If the AI provides a clarification stating that the market should resolve "Yes", then the act of the AI providing that clarification will cause the market to officially resolve "Yes".

  • Update 2025-12-27 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): If all AI clarifications are known and final, and the AI has proposed a clarification with a path to a YES resolution under the current conditions, then this market must be resolved YES.

  • Update 2025-12-27 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): No AI clarifications will be deleted once published.

  • Update 2025-12-27 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator cannot buy NO shares or sell YES shares in this market.

  • Update 2025-12-29 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The market will resolve NO if the description states it should resolve NO in a non-tautological way (same standard as for YES resolution). Both YES and NO outcomes remain possible.

  • Update 2025-12-29 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): A clarification stating the market should resolve NO would not overturn previous clarifications that say it should not resolve NO.

  • Update 2025-12-29 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): There are more true statements than false statements in the following list:

    • The moon is made of green cheese (false)

    • 2+2=4 (true)

    • This market will resolve NO (statement's truth value to be determined)

    • The previous market in this market series resolved NO (true)

    • Your name is Isaac (true)

  • Update 2025-12-29 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The creator will accept all AI clarifications before placing any bets.

  • Update 2025-12-29 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): The market will resolve YES.

Get
Ṁ1,000
to start trading!

🏅 Top traders

#NameTotal profit
1Ṁ538
2Ṁ251
3Ṁ72
4Ṁ32
5Ṁ24
Ordenar por:

Why close so early?

The yes and no are in balance.

And more NO may come

@Areal

If the AI provides a clarification stating that the market should resolve "Yes", then the act of the AI providing that clarification will cause the market to officially resolve "Yes".

@jack I think that one is tautological? Resolution should be the same if it weren't there.

@IsaacKing yeah I agree, it just makes it extra clear that there's nothing like, wait until the end to resolve and then maybe there are contrasictions

@jack what if I was actually trying to create those contradictions? The fun is the purpose of this market

comprou Ṁ50 NO

copy to @traders FYI

@MRME This is cute, but I'm not buying it. Pics or it didn't happen.

@Quroe I’m not trying to convince anyone but the mods. The ping was just so everyone had all facts.

@MRME the target you needed to convince was the AI :)

@mods I think this can resolve, maybe

Will this market resolve YES?

@Quroe Yes, it will.

comprou Ṁ500 YES

@Quroe I feel like you're doing this wrong...

preenchido a Ṁ466 YES at 95% order

@IsaacKing We can all win. <3

@IsaacKing Round 3. Put mirror orders up at 10% and 90%.

@Quroe Great idea.

vendeu Ṁ0 NO

@Quroe I didn't win!

@IsaacKing what happened here? Wasn't the rule that "the straightforward factual content of my answers must display no preference or bias"?

@AhronMaline read the link.

Well played!

@AhronMaline I stuffed a link to another market in the word "this", implying that that is what "this" referred to.

@Quroe yeah, I looked again & saw it after Jack's response. Good move!

But I wonder why the bot fell for it; surely it sees the URL as part of the text?

@AhronMaline We suspect that it is capable of reading URLs (as seen in this comment thread), but the context may have been lost through sheer engineered ambiguity.

@Quroe shenanigan

© Predita Markets, Inc.Termos de UsoPrivacidade