20 var decisions overturned: only actual VAR interference count, automated offside checks are not included
Most questions should be clear from official stats pages. I reserve the right to make calls on ambiguous cases
Update 2026-06-02 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): 15+ minutes of stoppage time refers to a single match, not aggregate across the tournament.
Update 2026-06-11 (PST) (AI summary of creator comment): Goals by default exclude penalty shoot-out goals unless otherwise specified.
1,000Pessoas também estão operando
@UniversalFC The World Cup game between France and Iraq on Monday was postponed for over two hours at halftime due to severe thunderstorms and lightning in the Philadelphia area
@KayoYin No. Canceled is not played and postponed is played another day. It was a basic weather delay.
@Mochi I'm not sure if he will be asked directly to provide a straight prediction for our question again, but here is what Google makes of it:
The Jersey Loyalty: Merlin loudly refused to engage with any Czech colors, staying firmly in his green El Tri jersey. Fans take this stubbornness as absolute proof that he rules out a loss or draw.
The Presidential Peck: Merlin feistily pecked President Sheinbaum at the National Palace. Fans interpret this aggressive move as a sign that Mexico will play with high intensity and full attack mode against the Czech Republic.
@UniversalFC Ghana's keeper Ati-Zigi is on the bench today, so he is not out for the rest of the tournament (or is he still if not on the pitch again!?!). I think he was the last critical case from the opening matches...
@UniversalFC Resolves Yes (if we already accept thet not all 4 teams can win since they face each other Bosnia/Qatar and Iraq/Senegal)
@CryptoNeoLiberalist What do you mean by “Asian”? Because Qatar already has 2 red cards and they are an AFC team
@SentientTree This is not the Asian and you know it like so. Please do not be giving me this bullshit today, I am having not the patience for the ticky-taka this day right now on the resolutions front.
@SentientTree I am in the bad mood, I apologize for my comment. It is not appropriate for me to be making it today. Logging off, goodnight. I am still the disappointing we have not seen the flag up or down on the field and it is not right to be like this. I thought this is the country of the free balling and instead we are having the hydration break.
@CryptoNeoLiberalist I’m sorry, what? I haven’t traded on this one, but it does not make any sense. Qatar is in Asia and is in the Asian confederation. It can’t get more Asian! I can understand excluding Australia as geographically it’s not in Asia even though it’s in AFC, but excluding Qatar players just seems ridiculous.
So it’s really “Japan, Uzbek or South Korean” player gets a red card?
@JayDH No need for discrimination against the middle easterners! Do not trying to make them what they are not, grouping them like the soulless Al bot. What are we doing next, Australia counting? No! Japan or South Korea but maybe another player. That’s it! I am not standing for the dangerous woke rhetoric of the hive mind buzzing in the ears of the comments.
@CryptoNeoLiberalist I think you need to give clearer resolution criteria than “Japan or South Korea or another player” – if Qatar is not considered asian, I think that’s surprising to most people who watch international football. What other players qualify for this?
@JayDH OK, maybe you are a little bit sick in the head? I do not have the ADA training or am the psychiatrist so I have none of the experience for talking to the people in this situation. I hear you, I understand you and I wanting to help you with it. I will changing the approach with it here and then I think we can suspend the talking any further because maybe it is far too much? It is worded the "Asian player" and not the "Asian football confederates AFC player or whatever in the world it is you're hanging onto by the thread trying to shake the resolution in your favor. It is worded very specific. Go to add gif, search for asian, and then this is what the person looking like who needs to get the red card for yes. It really is not the trick or tomfoolery here. It is quite simple and the voices sqwaking in your head like the bulbul are making it far difficult for us to hear.
To start with, I’m not trying to shake the resolution in my favour as as I said I haven’t traded on this question. But I do think the resolution is clearly wrong, as many people would have bet thinking there are 5(?) entire teams that qualify instead of just 2 + a few random extras.
When making markets, it’s good to actually make it clear what the resolution criteria is. Qataris and Uzbeks are asians because they’re in Asia and any reasonable reading of the question would assume they’re included, we have no way of reading your mind. I’m still a little unclear on what you mean, but I’m guessing you’re trying to say “person of asian ethnicity” but even saying “asian ethnicity” is unclear - in the UK, for example, “asian” usually refers to people of Indian or Pakistani descent - would NZ’s Sarpreet Singh count for example? You need to word the question better so people who are betting are better informed.